Good WLB.
Interesting problems being solved day-to-day.
Low pay.
Constant reorgs that make it impossible to plan work long-term.
Lack of clear company direction, constantly playing catch-up with rivals like Toast in the food & beverage space.
Lack of synergy between Square and Cash.
Poorly planned migration projects that constantly distract from real product work.
Disappointing career growth, especially in the last 2 years due to all of the above.
Lack of office culture lowers already low morale.
Overall, Square's interview process was fairly standard. They try to improve upon the process, and in some ways they do, but it ultimately falls short of their goals. For the most part, it comes down to luck (who you get to interview you) and memoriz
Quick and simple interview process: * Two rounds of one-hour phone interviews. * Then, two back-to-back one-hour onsite interviews with lunch and a tour. Quick rejection and expense reimbursement emails were sent after the onsite interviews.
I completed two technical phone screens and was then invited onsite. This is a typical process for larger tech companies. The onsite interview felt rather cold and robotic. Some interviewers were engaged, while others were not at all. One intervie
Overall, Square's interview process was fairly standard. They try to improve upon the process, and in some ways they do, but it ultimately falls short of their goals. For the most part, it comes down to luck (who you get to interview you) and memoriz
Quick and simple interview process: * Two rounds of one-hour phone interviews. * Then, two back-to-back one-hour onsite interviews with lunch and a tour. Quick rejection and expense reimbursement emails were sent after the onsite interviews.
I completed two technical phone screens and was then invited onsite. This is a typical process for larger tech companies. The onsite interview felt rather cold and robotic. Some interviewers were engaged, while others were not at all. One intervie