The phone screen had two questions, and I was called onsite after that.
Onsite, there were 2:1 interviews where both interviewers asked questions.
In the first technical round, the first interviewer gave me one medium linked list question, which I answered flawlessly and optimally. The other interviewer said, "Let me ask you something that I was just discussing with my colleague about his work just five minutes before the interview." He then started framing some random question on the board, and to this day, I do not know what he wanted to ask. The other interviewer also asked a question because he was not able to make sense of this nonsensical question being asked.
I mean, the job of a good interviewer is to come prepared with a question. Not only that, he should be prepared with hints too, just in case the interviewee gets stuck. But this guy was reinventing the wheel.
Then, in the second round, the same thing happened. This guy called it a design problem but then asked me to implement a complex algorithm related to it and then changed the problem statement 20 minutes into the interview.
I felt that the company just lets anybody who is free for the interview; there is no training and no process whatsoever. Nobody cares about the candidate experience.
After these technical interviews, I was walked out of the building by the HR, who could not answer my questions properly and was too busy Instagramming on her phone. So rude!
Design a room reservation system.
The following metrics were computed from 470 interview experiences for the Bloomberg LP Software Engineer role in New York, New York.
Bloomberg LP's interview process for their Software Engineer roles in New York, New York is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very good feelings for Bloomberg LP's Software Engineer interview process in New York, New York.