Good compensation, especially the benefits and paid time off.
Some really smart people as peers.
Career advancement is hard. Management decisions may be hard to fathom.
Employees must have a good idea of how they can help make Bloomberg better in their particular role, not as a generic org-wide mantra.
I had two rounds of interviews. The first round went well, and there were no bizarre problems. They first asked me to design a tree data structure for storing and retrieving stock prices quickly, and then asked a few basic questions about arrays, l
I submitted my resume and was contacted by a no-name email for an intelligence test that consisted of logic and reasoning questions. I then went for an "interview day" which consisted of: * A brief company introduction. * A "networking" session in
Applied online through the University Career Services office. * Attended an on-campus interview with a few developers who were pretty rude, but somehow I got through. * Was invited to a Bloomberg on-site interview.
I had two rounds of interviews. The first round went well, and there were no bizarre problems. They first asked me to design a tree data structure for storing and retrieving stock prices quickly, and then asked a few basic questions about arrays, l
I submitted my resume and was contacted by a no-name email for an intelligence test that consisted of logic and reasoning questions. I then went for an "interview day" which consisted of: * A brief company introduction. * A "networking" session in
Applied online through the University Career Services office. * Attended an on-campus interview with a few developers who were pretty rude, but somehow I got through. * Was invited to a Bloomberg on-site interview.