$ The money is good. The benefits are excellent. The perks are wonderful. The bonuses are large. The regular employees are awesome and fun to work with.
Management is ineffective at best, and incompetent at worst. The entire company is very much a cult of personality. There is a massive "not invented here" complex.
Mana gers that have risen through the ranks over the last few decades are very stodgy and outdated in their ideas about business and development best practices. I got negative performance reviews for mentoring others as the most senior developer on the team.
Management did not understand the problem space at all - web development - and this made it very difficult to have non-stressful conversations with them. Some teams at Bloomberg are better than others; mine was generally recognized as the worst.
The entire team went to senior management with complaints about the problems with our direct manager, but nothing was ever done.
The management that has risen to the top is often only concerned about saving their own skin.
Blame passing down to the lowest level is frequent, rather than having the backbone to assume the responsibility that is in fact on their shoulders.
Many tech decisions were made without the input of the resident experts, because management had inflated egos and zero humility.
The revered-to-the-point-of-worship "Bloomberg Culture" needs to be flushed down the toilet.
Very professional, thorough, and precise. The process included a 1-hour HackerRank screening, followed by an in-person interview at their office. There were 4 rounds of in-person interviews, each lasting 1 hour. The office was beautiful. I was co
HackerRank + Phone Interview I had a HackerRank code pair which was shared with the interviewer. The interview was quite interactive and friendly.
The interview process began with an initial online C/C++ test, followed by a phone screen, and then a full-day onsite interview. The onsite interview consisted of approximately 6 rounds, each lasting 45 minutes. Each round involved meeting with 2 de
Very professional, thorough, and precise. The process included a 1-hour HackerRank screening, followed by an in-person interview at their office. There were 4 rounds of in-person interviews, each lasting 1 hour. The office was beautiful. I was co
HackerRank + Phone Interview I had a HackerRank code pair which was shared with the interviewer. The interview was quite interactive and friendly.
The interview process began with an initial online C/C++ test, followed by a phone screen, and then a full-day onsite interview. The onsite interview consisted of approximately 6 rounds, each lasting 45 minutes. Each round involved meeting with 2 de