Good work/life balance. Good job stability.
Terrible managers Bad coffee and snacks Obsolete tech stack (not invented here syndrome) Cult-y vibe No growth (flat engineering hierarchy but many many management layers) Company is extremely stingy There is no platform for employees to make suggestions for improvements (forums are taken down)
You need to fire a lot of middle managers and give more power to engineers. They know better.
- Phone screen - Onsite with 3 rounds: - 2 technical interviews - 1 soft-skills interview Each interview had 2 interviewers. One technical interview focused on a LeetCode-style question, while the other involved asynchronous design, including a
CoderPad Test Phone Interview Most questions were on computer science fundamentals, such as trees, hashing, and sorting. Topics included time complexity analysis, data structures, and algorithms. Language-specific questions were limited, although
In general, the interview process was smooth. The experienced interviewers were nice, patient, polite, and helpful. However, other interviewers, who had less experience, seemed aggressive and impatient. They appeared to have learned a few things rece
- Phone screen - Onsite with 3 rounds: - 2 technical interviews - 1 soft-skills interview Each interview had 2 interviewers. One technical interview focused on a LeetCode-style question, while the other involved asynchronous design, including a
CoderPad Test Phone Interview Most questions were on computer science fundamentals, such as trees, hashing, and sorting. Topics included time complexity analysis, data structures, and algorithms. Language-specific questions were limited, although
In general, the interview process was smooth. The experienced interviewers were nice, patient, polite, and helpful. However, other interviewers, who had less experience, seemed aggressive and impatient. They appeared to have learned a few things rece