WLB is good for a lot of teams. No PIP policy.
Good and stable business.
Work mode not very flexible - stand-up meetings every day (even twice a day) for some teams.
No ladder for engineering, which means not clear career growth for a lot of people (you need to find your way out!).
No ladder leads to bad compensation growth as well.
Consider a ladder for ENG.
The interview was conducted using HackerRank. Questions focused on using data structures to organize input data and optimizing that data for retrieval/output purposes. There was a strong emphasis on space and time complexity.
My interviewer didn't show up to the first two interviews they scheduled me for, so I had to postpone the process by about a month. Then, after I passed the first interview, I was notified that the role had filled.
On-campus hire. Two rounds of coding, totaling four LeetCode questions. One hour for the interview, which included behavioral questions, a resume review, and a simple OOD-like question. All interviewers were nice. However, the final round manager
The interview was conducted using HackerRank. Questions focused on using data structures to organize input data and optimizing that data for retrieval/output purposes. There was a strong emphasis on space and time complexity.
My interviewer didn't show up to the first two interviews they scheduled me for, so I had to postpone the process by about a month. Then, after I passed the first interview, I was notified that the role had filled.
On-campus hire. Two rounds of coding, totaling four LeetCode questions. One hour for the interview, which included behavioral questions, a resume review, and a simple OOD-like question. All interviewers were nice. However, the final round manager