It's stable for the most part. Benefits aren't bad. A good place to begin a career, but not a great place to stay unless you value stability over innovation.
Ponderous, bureaucratic, the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. Paralyzed by indecision in many groups. Often had to hold initial meetings to decide how many meetings would be needed to make a decision, rather than just making the decision then and there. While pay and benefits aren't stellar, they are decent and reasonably stable. Some employees end up sticking around for the benefits rather than for any reasons related to pride in job or faith in senior management, which can lead to apathy amongst the lifers.
Shrug
The interview was a panel interview. I was asked about my experience in enterprise application development. My experience includes Java and J2EE systems, working with High-Availability Systems, Unix-based applications, and Clearcase. I also have ex
They didn't ask any technical questions about software engineering, even though the position was for a software engineering role on a fighter jet. So, yeah, it was easy and I got the job.
You sit down with a few managers and discuss your skills. The majority of the questions they ask are about situational experiences and what you would do in a particular situation.
The interview was a panel interview. I was asked about my experience in enterprise application development. My experience includes Java and J2EE systems, working with High-Availability Systems, Unix-based applications, and Clearcase. I also have ex
They didn't ask any technical questions about software engineering, even though the position was for a software engineering role on a fighter jet. So, yeah, it was easy and I got the job.
You sit down with a few managers and discuss your skills. The majority of the questions they ask are about situational experiences and what you would do in a particular situation.