Good work-life balance, good technical people, and good learning opportunities.
Flat organization, little scope for career advancement.
The interview took four weeks. There were six stages, involving different people, though sometimes the same individuals. The most difficult part was the step before the last. I was asked very difficult questions, but they were completely irrelevant
tl;dr: Overall, a positive experience. No offer, but I could consider applying again in the future for a different role. Phone screen: A decent coding problem. I had not seen the problem before but was able to code it up without too much trouble. Th
Here's a breakdown of the interview process: * **Step 1:** A 30-minute recruiter screening. * **Step 2:** A 1-hour technical coding exercise. The interviewer did not show up the first time and had to reschedule. * **Step 3:** A virtual on-site
The interview took four weeks. There were six stages, involving different people, though sometimes the same individuals. The most difficult part was the step before the last. I was asked very difficult questions, but they were completely irrelevant
tl;dr: Overall, a positive experience. No offer, but I could consider applying again in the future for a different role. Phone screen: A decent coding problem. I had not seen the problem before but was able to code it up without too much trouble. Th
Here's a breakdown of the interview process: * **Step 1:** A 30-minute recruiter screening. * **Step 2:** A 1-hour technical coding exercise. The interviewer did not show up the first time and had to reschedule. * **Step 3:** A virtual on-site