A business-oriented company, rather than a technology-focused one (a con from an engineer's point of view).
The process was simple. It conducted a written test which had three sections: * Section A consisted of aptitude questions. * Section B consisted of C/C++ questions. * Section C was general knowledge. Overall, the questions were average. You c
Typical LeetCode questions. They didn't ask much about projects or experience. Looking at the reviews, they asked the same question to design an LRU cache to me. On top of that, the platform they use doesn't have IntelliSense or any way to run the co
The process began with an aptitude round, followed by a couple of technical interviews. It was slightly on the tougher side. The technical questions in the interview were very tough. Initially, the aptitude test was equally tough. It was a very sat
The process was simple. It conducted a written test which had three sections: * Section A consisted of aptitude questions. * Section B consisted of C/C++ questions. * Section C was general knowledge. Overall, the questions were average. You c
Typical LeetCode questions. They didn't ask much about projects or experience. Looking at the reviews, they asked the same question to design an LRU cache to me. On top of that, the platform they use doesn't have IntelliSense or any way to run the co
The process began with an aptitude round, followed by a couple of technical interviews. It was slightly on the tougher side. The technical questions in the interview were very tough. Initially, the aptitude test was equally tough. It was a very sat