Recruitment and interviewing were pretty quick affairs without any hang-ups. Their engineering team held an extremely effective technical interviewing process that not only allowed me to show off my skill set effectively but also introduced me to their team dynamic and philosophies.
Better than almost all tech hirings I've dealt with, so finding it hard to identify cons on this one.
I was super impressed with Calendly's interview process. For the code screen, it was the only one I've seen where the interviewers had set up runnable tests. This made the core discussion parts of the interview much more meaningful.
1. Culture and Tech fit screen. 2. One-on-one technical interview, focused on philosophy. 3. Group interview: Given a scenario, create, present, and defend a reference architecture to the group. 4. One-on-one culture interview with hiring manager.
Call with a recruiter, call with the hiring manager, take-home test that involves writing bug reports and a few automated tests for a simple web app. After that, panel interviews over a few weeks with two interviewers each, over a few days, comprisin
I was super impressed with Calendly's interview process. For the code screen, it was the only one I've seen where the interviewers had set up runnable tests. This made the core discussion parts of the interview much more meaningful.
1. Culture and Tech fit screen. 2. One-on-one technical interview, focused on philosophy. 3. Group interview: Given a scenario, create, present, and defend a reference architecture to the group. 4. One-on-one culture interview with hiring manager.
Call with a recruiter, call with the hiring manager, take-home test that involves writing bug reports and a few automated tests for a simple web app. After that, panel interviews over a few weeks with two interviewers each, over a few days, comprisin