Good culture and good people to work with most of the time.
Capgemini offers a lot of certifications for learners. There is an annual budget dedicated by the group for it.
A good work-life balance if you don't adhere to the need of animating a lot of workshops in schools or others.
Evolution is tricky after grade B. Technically, a lot of argument can be relied upon by your career manager, valuing and focusing solely on the visibility of the individual to top management accomplishments made for Capgemini, without any consideration of client satisfaction or project success.
A lot of processes have been made and confirmed with HR management to somehow adjust the process of evolution. However, in practice, the process is simply tailor-made and not respected if a worker decides to leave, if they have someone on top management grade D+ that can defend their case.
Bad balance life/work if you follow top management's advice and focus on animating many time-consuming external events.
Also, note that Capgemini Rabat is considered an extension. In this regard, employees don't have the same evolution ratio compared to Casablanca. The information is also badly managed from top-down regarding privileges or formation. Generally, Rabat will have the information only through selected few.
Change the logic where client work is considered a "must-have" to having animating "colloquials", events, and a lot of pictures in social media considered the "must-regarded value."
I applied through off-campus as a fresher. It was very well managed and organized; they had three rounds: First, we had a written aptitude round to filter out most of the people. Next was a technical round, with basic questions asked, like simple S
The interview consisted of two phases. In the first phase, they mostly asked questions related to my projects and coursework. They also asked a few basic DS questions. The second round was an HR round.
Two technical rounds followed by an HR round. Basic C++ questions were asked in the first round. The second round involved: * Project-based questions * Standard Template Library * Virtual functions * Design patterns * Runtime polymorphism
I applied through off-campus as a fresher. It was very well managed and organized; they had three rounds: First, we had a written aptitude round to filter out most of the people. Next was a technical round, with basic questions asked, like simple S
The interview consisted of two phases. In the first phase, they mostly asked questions related to my projects and coursework. They also asked a few basic DS questions. The second round was an HR round.
Two technical rounds followed by an HR round. Basic C++ questions were asked in the first round. The second round involved: * Project-based questions * Standard Template Library * Virtual functions * Design patterns * Runtime polymorphism