It's a good company to work for.
Too many meetings to need to attend about policy.
The interview process involved four steps. The first was a simple HR interview, and the second was an assessment scored out of 1200 points. I scored 1000 points and still didn't make it past for some reason, even though they said scoring at least 60
There was one round with the hiring manager. The interview lasted 30 minutes and consisted of a technical Q&A with the Technical Lead of the team. There was no live coding. They asked about my experience and how I would solve issues. I received an
It's a long 4-hour "power" interview, as they call it. It has an architectural part, a coding part, some kind of "business question" part (where a software engineer might be asked mostly irrelevant, mind-boggling questions about calculating profit, m
The interview process involved four steps. The first was a simple HR interview, and the second was an assessment scored out of 1200 points. I scored 1000 points and still didn't make it past for some reason, even though they said scoring at least 60
There was one round with the hiring manager. The interview lasted 30 minutes and consisted of a technical Q&A with the Technical Lead of the team. There was no live coding. They asked about my experience and how I would solve issues. I received an
It's a long 4-hour "power" interview, as they call it. It has an architectural part, a coding part, some kind of "business question" part (where a software engineer might be asked mostly irrelevant, mind-boggling questions about calculating profit, m