Pros: Interesting tech stack. Engineering teams are relatively free to choose the tools that they use. Good opportunities for career development. Good, but not market-leading, package overall. Great work-life balance.

Cons: - Commercial sells features before they are ready or even built, and promises delivery dates without involving the actual engineers who will build the stuff. - The London office doesn't have any food in it other than nuts. - Good senior people have been replaced by external candidates multiple times. - Executives are seemingly getting more disconnected from employees as the company grows. - Complete inflexibility about 'flexible' working arrangements; if you can't do the mandated days, then you have to leave. - Spent 1 year being extremely vague about what the return to the office would look like, and then implemented a company-wide policy that not many people wanted.

Pros: 1. The benefits are good. 2. The majority of the people are amazing to work with; you can learn a lot if you are early in your career. 3. Depending on your team, you may have interesting and challenging work. 4. Depending on your manager, you probably have the flexibility to try out new services or tech stacks, given it has a valid use case.

Cons: 1. The leadership team will track your attendance starting from 2024, which is related to the RTO policy they implemented. The CEO explicitly stated in an AEM, "If you don't like RTO, then please find another job." I know of a few people in the company who missed one day in the office and received a verbal warning. 2. Leadership will do whatever they want and whenever they want. An example of this is the 2023 Christmas period when they decided to close down two offices (Berlin and Porto). Some people did receive a reallocation package, but many did not. Those who did were reallocated to different teams. 3. Reorgs are done regularly. During my time at Checkout, I was part of three reorgs. This means that if a team is not fully cut, they most likely will have different priorities, introducing a lot of friction. I know a manager who lost 50% of his team and was then moved to another department and team. 4. Every six months, you will be part of a review cycle. The CEO implemented stack ranking (Amazon style), promoting a toxic company culture. This is because someone in your team must get a 2 (bottom of the rank). When I first joined Checkout.com, this ranking system wasn't in place. This meant that if you were performing at the next promotion level, you would get promoted. Also, if you were lucky to get promoted, rest assured your salary increase wouldn't be the best. If you are planning to join the company, try to negotiate a higher salary from the start, as any subsequent salary increase as part of promotions will be disappointing. 5. Due to the reasons stated above, many people are leaving from various departments. You can expect delays from other teams when you need to work together to get features out. This is also due to the fact that every team is trying to achieve allocated OKRs (which are meant to be super ambitious, as the CEO puts it, but you can already guess what happens if you miss them). 6. The office itself is a bit crowded at times (probably something to do with the RTO 🤷), so finding rooms for in-person meetings can be challenging. You may still end up doing meetings over Zoom, which defeats the purpose of RTO. 7. Customer first is one significant thing the leadership team abides by, and this shows as employee morale and voice are ignored at every step of the way. This is reflected in the Peakon score for the company, which is now not even spoken about as the score is very low.

Pros: Challenging work. Some teams have amazingly talented people, and there is a lot of opportunity to grow and develop in some areas of engineering.

Cons: Very political environment, with performance reviews unable to account for technical input and outcomes. They rely extensively on "being liked by everyone" and being agreeable with whatever nonsense managers may dream up overnight. Senior management does not care about individuals; they think everyone has the same needs as them and tries to fit everyone into the same model that works for them. The best example for this is the latest return-to-office change, which indiscriminately expects everyone to further tweak the hybrid model.