Interesting tech stack. Engineering teams are relatively free to choose the tools that they use. Good opportunities for career development. Good, but not market-leading, package overall. Great work-life balance.
Offer more flexibility to staff with regards to working arrangements. The current stance by the company seems to be to ignore all questions about remote working. There were many questions about it at the latest all-employee meeting, which were promised to be 'answered'; however, very few of these were followed up on. To state that productivity has dropped for remote workers without quantifying in any way how that conclusion was made is laughable and somewhat offensive.
People from technology have left and will continue to leave because of the hybrid working policy and the lack of flexibility within it. Some candidates won't consider Checkout due to this policy.
From my point of view, the package offered doesn't offer anything that you can't get elsewhere, so as soon as engineers start looking, they'll find something offering the flexibility they desire.
People have requested remote working arrangements for a variety of reasons, which have so far been pretty much all flat-out refused by People Operations. Letters have been written by People Operations refusing requests, and managers have been forced to sign.
This policy is causing divisions between managers and their reports, as they have to tow the company line on it and can't do anything to support their reports.
I'm interested to see that Checkout has been reviewed as a 'Great Place to Work' after the botched implementation of the hybrid working policy. I believe that Checkout is no longer a 'Great Place to Work' for the reasons I've stated above; however, I believe it could once again become a 'Great Place to Work' if management starts caring about their employees again.
I was contacted by their internal people acquisition team and had an initial 30-minute call. This was standard, light-touch, discussing my motivation for job hunting and previous experience. It felt very rote and pro-forma. The next round was an hou
I had a great experience during my interview process with Checkout. From the start, they provided excellent support and explained the entire process clearly. The interview stages included: * A discussion with their talent acquisition team. * A tech
1 easy HackerRank, 2 technical rounds followed. They are a very cheap company. The offer was terrible: £40k and no RSUs. It's funny how they kept showing a video of a guy who went skydiving because he won something in the company, yet they don't off
I was contacted by their internal people acquisition team and had an initial 30-minute call. This was standard, light-touch, discussing my motivation for job hunting and previous experience. It felt very rote and pro-forma. The next round was an hou
I had a great experience during my interview process with Checkout. From the start, they provided excellent support and explained the entire process clearly. The interview stages included: * A discussion with their talent acquisition team. * A tech
1 easy HackerRank, 2 technical rounds followed. They are a very cheap company. The offer was terrible: £40k and no RSUs. It's funny how they kept showing a video of a guy who went skydiving because he won something in the company, yet they don't off