Checkr

Senior Fullstack Software Engineer Interview Experience

August 6, 2023

Negative ExperienceNo Offer

Process

Recruiter screen, then a manager interview. Both basically talked about Checkr's culture and values.

Then came a coding challenge that was basically looking for free work. They basically give you a feature and expect perfection.

After that, there is a panel interview.

Questions

What do you want from your next position?

Was this helpful?

Interview Statistics

The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Checkr Senior Fullstack Software Engineer role in United States.

Success Rate

0%

Pass Rate

Checkr's interview process for their Senior Fullstack Software Engineer roles in the United States is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.

Experience Rating

Positive0%

Neutral0%

Negative100%

Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Checkr's Senior Fullstack Software Engineer interview process in United States.

Checkr Work Experiences

Good Perks, Risky Job

Software Engineer • Current Employee

San Francisco, California, United States

Pros: Great perks, decent pay, and connection events.

Cons: Do not get too comfortable; they will be quick to layoff and eliminate positions.

Good Perks, Risky Job

Software Engineer • Current Employee

San Francisco, California, United States

Pros: Great perks, decent pay, and connection events.

Cons: Do not get too comfortable; they will be quick to layoff and eliminate positions.

Strong engineers but frequent organizational changes

Staff Database Engineer • Former Employee

Pros: Great engineers and employees in general.

Cons: There were lots of pivots and constant reorgs.

Strong engineers but frequent organizational changes

Staff Database Engineer • Former Employee

Pros: Great engineers and employees in general.

Cons: There were lots of pivots and constant reorgs.

Glory Days Are Over

Software Developer • Former Employee

December 6, 2017

Pros: Killer eng/product team. Grew super duper fast early on, with a lot of great people, especially within the eng team. Ownership of the on-demand market. The CTO is an awesome guy, and they have built a good leadership team.

Cons: Commodity: The background check is a commodity, and market leaders are now copying the Checkr API and beginning to take customers. I don't see Checkr winning deals outside of on-demand because they outsource processes like the county search, where market leaders are making strides to do this in-house. Their approach of getting out of the "on-demand" space is simply not working. They rely on one customer that makes up about 70% of their revenue, and that gap isn't getting any smaller. Customer Success/Sales: It seems like politics drove out some good folks in this department. They won deals years ago because no competitor had an API. Now that others are coming to market with the same thing, they are starting to lose business. Additionally, the sales leadership is very misguided. There has been a ton of turnover for a product that seemingly sells itself. From what I've heard, the sales leader is more or less a bully. Exit Options: No Consumer Reporting Agency has ever gone public. Their revenue is very unhealthy (think 90% of revenue from 3 customers). They are too big / raised too much to sell, and no one wants to buy a CRA outside of a P/E firm (according to history).

Glory Days Are Over

Software Developer • Former Employee

December 6, 2017

Pros: Killer eng/product team. Grew super duper fast early on, with a lot of great people, especially within the eng team. Ownership of the on-demand market. The CTO is an awesome guy, and they have built a good leadership team.

Cons: Commodity: The background check is a commodity, and market leaders are now copying the Checkr API and beginning to take customers. I don't see Checkr winning deals outside of on-demand because they outsource processes like the county search, where market leaders are making strides to do this in-house. Their approach of getting out of the "on-demand" space is simply not working. They rely on one customer that makes up about 70% of their revenue, and that gap isn't getting any smaller. Customer Success/Sales: It seems like politics drove out some good folks in this department. They won deals years ago because no competitor had an API. Now that others are coming to market with the same thing, they are starting to lose business. Additionally, the sales leadership is very misguided. There has been a ton of turnover for a product that seemingly sells itself. From what I've heard, the sales leader is more or less a bully. Exit Options: No Consumer Reporting Agency has ever gone public. Their revenue is very unhealthy (think 90% of revenue from 3 customers). They are too big / raised too much to sell, and no one wants to buy a CRA outside of a P/E firm (according to history).

Good Perks, Risky Job

Software Engineer • Current Employee

San Francisco, California, United States

Pros: Great perks, decent pay, and connection events.

Cons: Do not get too comfortable; they will be quick to layoff and eliminate positions.

2.0
Good Perks, Risky Job
Software Engineer • Current Employee
San Francisco, California, United States
June 13, 2025
Pros: Great perks, decent pay, and connection events.
Cons: Do not get too comfortable; they will be quick to layoff and eliminate positions.

Strong engineers but frequent organizational changes

Staff Database Engineer • Former Employee

Pros: Great engineers and employees in general.

Cons: There were lots of pivots and constant reorgs.

4.0
Strong engineers but frequent organizational changes
Staff Database Engineer • Former Employee
Denver, CO
July 29, 2026
Pros: Great engineers and employees in general.
Cons: There were lots of pivots and constant reorgs.

Glory Days Are Over

Software Developer • Former Employee

December 6, 2017

Pros: Killer eng/product team. Grew super duper fast early on, with a lot of great people, especially within the eng team. Ownership of the on-demand market. The CTO is an awesome guy, and they have built a good leadership team.

Cons: Commodity: The background check is a commodity, and market leaders are now copying the Checkr API and beginning to take customers. I don't see Checkr winning deals outside of on-demand because they outsource processes like the county search, where market leaders are making strides to do this in-house. Their approach of getting out of the "on-demand" space is simply not working. They rely on one customer that makes up about 70% of their revenue, and that gap isn't getting any smaller. Customer Success/Sales: It seems like politics drove out some good folks in this department. They won deals years ago because no competitor had an API. Now that others are coming to market with the same thing, they are starting to lose business. Additionally, the sales leadership is very misguided. There has been a ton of turnover for a product that seemingly sells itself. From what I've heard, the sales leader is more or less a bully. Exit Options: No Consumer Reporting Agency has ever gone public. Their revenue is very unhealthy (think 90% of revenue from 3 customers). They are too big / raised too much to sell, and no one wants to buy a CRA outside of a P/E firm (according to history).

2.0
Glory Days Are Over
Software Developer • Former Employee
December 6, 2017
Pros: Killer eng/product team. Grew super duper fast early on, with a lot of great people, especially within the eng team. Ownership of the on-demand market. The CTO is an awesome guy, and they have built a good leadership team.
Cons: Commodity: The background check is a commodity, and market leaders are now copying the Checkr API and beginning to take customers. I don't see Checkr winning deals outside of on-demand because they outsource processes like the county search, where market leaders are making strides to do this in-house. Their approach of getting out of the "on-demand" space is simply not working. They rely on one customer that makes up about 70% of their revenue, and that gap isn't getting any smaller. Customer Success/Sales: It seems like politics drove out some good folks in this department. They won deals years ago because no competitor had an API. Now that others are coming to market with the same thing, they are starting to lose business. Additionally, the sales leadership is very misguided. There has been a ton of turnover for a product that seemingly sells itself. From what I've heard, the sales leader is more or less a bully. Exit Options: No Consumer Reporting Agency has ever gone public. Their revenue is very unhealthy (think 90% of revenue from 3 customers). They are too big / raised too much to sell, and no one wants to buy a CRA outside of a P/E firm (according to history).

Copyright © Taro