Pros: - Supportive team - Good perks - Ability to try out different things

Cons: Your experience varies greatly team by team.

Pros: I have no doubt there are some good groups in Cisco. The key is to get hired into just those where politics is at a minimum and there is more focus on the engineering itself. Now pray you are not involuntarily transferred to some other group due to a reorg. Working from home is not a problem, and they have very flexible work hours as long as one is delivering. The work can be interesting.

Cons: When I started at Cisco a long time ago, it was a really fun place to work. We used to be busy with actual technical projects and customer-driven features that actually made sense. My peers and manager were also good and more focused on the technical aspects than on just getting ahead in the hierarchy. Re-orgs are an integral part of Cisco, and I soon found myself in less-than-ideal company. I ended up working for worse and worse managers. There were many cliques which managers seemed to encourage. If you did the technical work expected of you and did not question the order, you were okay. In the end, visibility, how you managed upward, and politicking worked much better than actually doing the engineering work well. We sometimes buy equipment for the labs just so the budget doesn't go to waste; the equipment lies in the labs unused. Talkers are preferred over doers. Peers/leads were more interested in looking good (i.e., not being contradicted) than actually making good technical decisions.

Pros: I learned to troubleshoot Cisco routers and switches.

Cons: If I look down, then I say I worked as a field engineer.