There's an interest in unit testing and automation, and in agile development. Benefits are pretty good, with 4 weeks of PTO. In a company this size, policies are well-developed, if a bit hard to know where to find them.
Unrealistic deadlines result in faster and faster accumulation of technical debt.
The tools available for developers are extremely clumsy.
The bug tracker is awful (hard to use, can't have multiple tabs open to different bugs, has filtering but no real search).
The version control system is Perforce, and my division dreads having it rolled out to us.
At least on the command line, usability is not taken into account, making it difficult for developers to use the products we're meant to be developing and leaving us wondering how customers can stand it.
Short-term thinking will harm long-term goals. If a developer says some legacy code needs to be rearchitected, listen to them and make it a priority, especially if it's the source of a large portion of support calls.
I was called for an interview on campus after handing over my resume at a career fair. The interview lasted 40 minutes, where they mostly asked questions related to my previous experience and some basic networking, OS, and programming questions. I
During campus interviews, I had only one interview. They selected candidates based on grade point average; the interview was kind of a formality. It was only a 45-minute interview, conducted by two Cisco engineers.
Three rounds of interviews and one written test. The test covered software, hardware, networking, and aptitude. The aptitude section had a much higher weightage than the other sections. There were: * 20 questions from aptitude * 5 questions fro
I was called for an interview on campus after handing over my resume at a career fair. The interview lasted 40 minutes, where they mostly asked questions related to my previous experience and some basic networking, OS, and programming questions. I
During campus interviews, I had only one interview. They selected candidates based on grade point average; the interview was kind of a formality. It was only a 45-minute interview, conducted by two Cisco engineers.
Three rounds of interviews and one written test. The test covered software, hardware, networking, and aptitude. The aptitude section had a much higher weightage than the other sections. There were: * 20 questions from aptitude * 5 questions fro