I'd like to think that I understood the corporate strategy for areas of technological expansion.
Some good centralized initiatives for creating a better engineering organization, with encouraging videos from different parts of the organization.
The message isn't getting through to lower-level managers, who appear to be much more concerned with arbitrary customer deadlines than improving their ability to deliver software reliably.
Many have noted the onerous demands of the centralized bureaucracy on individuals and teams, particularly the Open Source legal compliance processes.
If you really want to have a more responsive and effective engineering organization:
1. Call with recruiter 2. Technical interview 1 (coding) 3. Onsite interview 3a. Technical interview 2 (logic, DSA) 3b. Technical interview 3 (code review, project discussion) 3c. Hiring manager interview (GitHub project review)
Questions covered DSA, basic Operating Systems, and networking. Additionally, there was a behavioral round. This round reviewed my resume and presented situational questions for me to respond to. I received the interview call through GHC. The proces
I successfully completed the online assessment, demonstrating proficiency in all questions and test cases. However, there has been no communication or update on the interview process from the company since.
1. Call with recruiter 2. Technical interview 1 (coding) 3. Onsite interview 3a. Technical interview 2 (logic, DSA) 3b. Technical interview 3 (code review, project discussion) 3c. Hiring manager interview (GitHub project review)
Questions covered DSA, basic Operating Systems, and networking. Additionally, there was a behavioral round. This round reviewed my resume and presented situational questions for me to respond to. I received the interview call through GHC. The proces
I successfully completed the online assessment, demonstrating proficiency in all questions and test cases. However, there has been no communication or update on the interview process from the company since.