There is a lot of autonomy, so if you're the kind of person who needs the work to be handed to you, you'll have to adjust.
Since crypto is a very fast-paced field, you will often have multiple projects on the go at the same time. Work-life balance is usually relatively bad, although the company does offer recharge days (and weeks) so that we can all take time off.
This is the biggest con: you get assessed if you're "on-track" or "off-track" every quarter. If you're "off-track", you have 60 days to fix it. It's quite an aggressive stance, similar to Amazon's PIP program, which is notoriously toxic.
The concept of being "off-track"/"on-track" and getting 60 days to fix being "off-track" is a very draconian and Amazon-like measure. Amazon has one of the lowest employee satisfaction ratings in Big Tech, and PIP is precisely the reason why. I would strongly urge you to reconsider or amend something to this plan, as many employees think it's quite toxic.
This also directly conflicts our value of "continuous learning."
A recruiter reached out. I had a 30-minute phone screen, followed by a link to complete Code Signal and Cultural Assessment quizzes. I was given two weeks to complete them. Afterwards, I had four rounds of 1:1 interviews for the onsite.
OA was very simple, followed by an onsite. The OA was a four-part LC-style question. The onsite was similar but in-front of two interviewers. The OA was a simple banking question - make sure to plan out all four parts early on, otherwise going back w
The interview process included: * A take-home coding assessment * An onsite interview consisting of two technical interviews and one behavioral interview with the hiring manager Prior to this, I also completed a logic assessment. Overall, the i
A recruiter reached out. I had a 30-minute phone screen, followed by a link to complete Code Signal and Cultural Assessment quizzes. I was given two weeks to complete them. Afterwards, I had four rounds of 1:1 interviews for the onsite.
OA was very simple, followed by an onsite. The OA was a four-part LC-style question. The onsite was similar but in-front of two interviewers. The OA was a simple banking question - make sure to plan out all four parts early on, otherwise going back w
The interview process included: * A take-home coding assessment * An onsite interview consisting of two technical interviews and one behavioral interview with the hiring manager Prior to this, I also completed a logic assessment. Overall, the i