Pros: Hiring process: The whole hiring process was great. The recruiters always told me about the next steps and what else was missing in the process. The process went quite quickly (in fact, I slowed it down a bit because I was doing another process). At the end, I had a team matching round where I was able to pick between 3 teams. I was also able to negotiate a pretty good compensation package. Onboarding: The onboarding was well organized. You have 30-day, 60-day, and 90-day "lookbacks" (reviews) to see if you're meeting expectations and what you should be focusing on. My manager is pretty hands-off and the team has been very welcoming, helping me with the ramp up and answering any questions for me. The office: I'm based in the Madrid office. You have to come 3 days per week. You have free lunches Monday, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Most people either come Mon-Wed or Mon/Wed/Fri. The office usually organizes office-wide activities once a month. There is a mix of international and Spanish-speakers. The company/Exec: IMO Exec seems to have a clear direction for the company. Things get a bit more fuzzy at the team level, with Product and Engineering disagreeing on the specifics of certain OKRs/efforts (classic Tech). Depending on your Org/team, things can feel a bit more hierarchical, but overall I've had a very good feeling of the company.

Cons: I can't think of much. The 3-days per week office policy is okay, but I really hope they don't change it. Otherwise, I know a lot of people would be unhappy. It also depends a lot on your manager or organization. I know some people come once or twice a week, and their managers don't care. Others would get a comment in their 1-1s if they haven't come 60% of the days to the office in a given month.

Pros: The engineers are both skilled and good to work with. Building a product that is useful and sold to customers, vs selling your users, is a pleasure.

Cons: Management recently added an AI mandate, so look elsewhere if you don't want to be required to use LLMs.

Pros: 1. Founder-led with a long-term vision – Leadership prioritizes sustainable growth over short-term gains. 2. Industry-leading products – We dogfood everything internally, ensuring high quality and first-hand user experience. 3. Talented and collaborative colleagues – You’ll work with smart, driven people who are eager to solve complex problems together.

Cons: 1. Limited opportunities for remote employees – Remote employees have fewer career growth and internal mobility options compared to in-office counterparts. Strict location requirements severely limit my ability to pursue new roles within Datadog, as very few teams are open to remote hires anymore. 2. Lack of career growth opportunities – My responsibilities and impact have grown significantly, but this has not been reflected in my compensation. For example, despite leading a large team of engineers, my pay remains the same as an individual contributor. There is a disconnect between increased scope and recognition. 3. Lack of transparency – Leadership often makes decisions in isolation and communicates them only after the fact. Instead of fostering strong, autonomous teams capable of making informed decisions, there is a tendency to micromanage. Leadership should focus on enabling teams with the context and trust they need to drive decisions effectively. (This may be specific to my department, rather than the company as a whole.)