The first interview with the CTO went well and was quite positive. The second interview involved an algorithm writing task, which was surprising but went well.
After a two-week silence, the recruiter contacted me, explaining they had forgotten to follow up. I was then given a coding exercise to submit. It was not easy, but interesting and took a few hours of work. I never heard back about it; there was no feedback.
Subsequently, there was a full day of on-site interviews. A junior developer asked me to write an algorithm on a whiteboard. This was the first time I encountered such a request for an SRE/DevOps interview. The code didn't even relate to Ops or Systems work, and again, no mention or feedback was given regarding the home exercise, which was more Ops/System related.
Other interviews went pretty well.
I eventually received a no-reply email late on a Saturday night, with no explanation.
I believe they should be more upfront about the level of developer skills and experience they expect for an SRE, and provide a little more feedback after six interviews.
Asked to code on a whiteboard.
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Datadog SRE role in New York, New York.
Datadog's interview process for their SRE roles in New York, New York is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Datadog's SRE interview process in New York, New York.