I recently completed the interview process with Workforce (a company with over 10,000 employees), reaching the final round after successfully passing three prior interviews involving three different interviewers (HR, technical/hiring manager, and director-level staff).
Unfortunately, my experience was deeply disappointing — particularly for a company that positions itself as a leader in workforce management software.
Several red flags stood out:
The interview structure felt disorganized. Despite multiple interviewers, there were no substantive or in-depth technical questions — even for a technical role. One interviewer asked me to “explain what happens when you click on google.com” — a question so basic and vague that it raised concerns about whether the team understood the role’s requirements or how to evaluate candidates effectively. After investing significant time and effort, I received no feedback — not even an acknowledgment of my final interview. My follow-up email went completely unanswered. Radio silence. For a company of this size and reputation, I expected a higher level of professionalism, preparation, and respect for candidates’ time.
I cannot recommend applying to Workforce unless you’re prepared for a potentially frustrating and unprofessional experience.
Tell us more about application migration to the cloud?
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Dayforce Systems Architect role in Toronto, Canada.
Dayforce's interview process for their Systems Architect roles in Toronto, Canada is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Dayforce's Systems Architect interview process in Toronto, Canada.