Live coding challenge. Poorly executed selection process: they ask you to share your screen, have too many tests, and ask for ridiculous things. This company is not worth it; it's bad.
The interview process consisted of the following steps: * Call with recruiter * Take-home assessment focused on Node.js and SQL. It was not a hard challenge and resembled real-world problems. * Architectural review with engineers who are part
The recruiter contacted me regarding the initial interview process and two employees for a technical interview. The recruiter was a good and nice person to us, but the other two employees really showed their attitude.
Live coding challenge. Poorly executed selection process: they ask you to share your screen, have too many tests, and ask for ridiculous things. This company is not worth it; it's bad.
The interview process consisted of the following steps: * Call with recruiter * Take-home assessment focused on Node.js and SQL. It was not a hard challenge and resembled real-world problems. * Architectural review with engineers who are part
The recruiter contacted me regarding the initial interview process and two employees for a technical interview. The recruiter was a good and nice person to us, but the other two employees really showed their attitude.