Rejected for "not asking questions". Here is my experience:
Mind you, I'm not insecure about getting rejected - but check this out. I was rejected for "the primary reason not to move forward is that insufficient time was taken to clarify the requirements and scope of the task before diving into a solution".
Really?? Not only I asked questions, I dedicated an entire part of the interview for discussing two major kinds of requirements. If I could share pictures, I would love to show you the whiteboard I have, the left 30% of the whiteboard is English handwriting, all words, bullet-point list, not a single box or arrow. Thirty percent of the white space was dedicated to debating and discussing requirements. I only started drawing "diving into a solution", after I ended that part, at which point I asked the interviewers, how do you feel about that? are we on the same page? (mind you that was my second time inviting debate), awkward silence, then one said "I think it sounds good".
I know I'm not exotic, I know I'm not going to improve your DEI metrics. But so what now? Do men have to undergo some hormone therapy to become hireable in the tech industry, how out of touch can those companies be? My advise is not to apply if you do not belong to one of those categories, because it will be just a huge waste of time for you.
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the DeepL Staff Site Reliability Engineer role.
DeepL's interview process for their Staff Site Reliability Engineer roles is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for DeepL's Staff Site Reliability Engineer interview process.