The company gave food, pay, and interesting challenges.
The company takes huge risks, which might expose employees.
The interviewer is unclear about what is needed, asking questions for the sake of it, irrespective of the candidate's experience. We are also unsure about the role, and feedback is not given immediately.
The interview process was good. The interviewers checked general skills and aptitude. The questions focused more on a person's aptitude than rote memory. The intent was to see if the person has a learning attitude and excellent skills.
1 phone screen, 1 on-site interview, 1 follow-up phone interview. The on-site interview involved three panels, with two persons at a time (one on the phone from a remote location).
The interviewer is unclear about what is needed, asking questions for the sake of it, irrespective of the candidate's experience. We are also unsure about the role, and feedback is not given immediately.
The interview process was good. The interviewers checked general skills and aptitude. The questions focused more on a person's aptitude than rote memory. The intent was to see if the person has a learning attitude and excellent skills.
1 phone screen, 1 on-site interview, 1 follow-up phone interview. The on-site interview involved three panels, with two persons at a time (one on the phone from a remote location).