CEO seems still in touch with what's realistically feasible with AI. Stock price is pretty steady. Communication culture is respectful when there are disagreements. Coworkers are collaborative and supportive. Spring 2023 layoffs appeared to be handled compassionately.
At the end of June 2023, they announced that starting for any babies born 1/1/24, the parental leave benefit changed.
Previously, it was 24 weeks paid at 100% for all caregivers, to all full-time employees regardless of tenure (equitable between genders, generous for a U.S.-based employer, attractive to new hires).
Now, it is 20 weeks paid for birthing parents and 12 weeks for non-birthing parents, subject to a tenure requirement of at least 1 year.
The reasoning given was that they are "operating in a more demanding environment. Rather than making lots of little cuts across our benefits, or taking actions that other companies have taken like freezing comp increases or promotions, [the CEO] decided to bring our parental leave policy more in line with our peers."
To me, this is self-evidently a terrible decision for employee morale. I am extremely skeptical that the costs saved would have a significant effect on the risk of further layoffs in the future.
I warn potential candidates about it in every informational interview I have done since then.
Even though this policy change doesn't affect me directly, it makes me think that no one in the leadership team "gets it" for actually supporting employees having lives outside of work.
I know this was a KMP question, but I haven't reviewed that in forever, so I had to make do with writing out the N^2 solution. The interviewer made me feel horrible by remaining silent most of the time and giving very little hints or guidance. This
Started with a technical assessment via CodeSignal, which was kind of uncomfortable. Monitoring by camera, microphone, screen share, ID upload, selfie, etc. A lot of work to keep someone in a high-pressure environment, but I think the standards are "
First was a Codility proctored exercise for 90 minutes. There were around 4 levels. The problem was that if you got stuck in level 2, you could not get to levels 3 and 4. The tool was not the best. I did not proceed further after a 600/1000 score.
I know this was a KMP question, but I haven't reviewed that in forever, so I had to make do with writing out the N^2 solution. The interviewer made me feel horrible by remaining silent most of the time and giving very little hints or guidance. This
Started with a technical assessment via CodeSignal, which was kind of uncomfortable. Monitoring by camera, microphone, screen share, ID upload, selfie, etc. A lot of work to keep someone in a high-pressure environment, but I think the standards are "
First was a Codility proctored exercise for 90 minutes. There were around 4 levels. The problem was that if you got stuck in level 2, you could not get to levels 3 and 4. The tool was not the best. I did not proceed further after a 600/1000 score.