2 stars because this company is stable and survivable.
Some good people here and there.
Squeeze hard-working people to do more work and lay them off without consideration of skill and talents (for them, just division of money-makers).
Rapidly losing talented people because of that, and a lack of ability to attract talented people.
What this company is heading to, we all know.
Care more on sales and customer service than interest on the development side. Good luck that you can maintain the product or involve the product anymore.
Causing a dead-walking effect in the company.
No career advancement, no appreciation.
Fix it or lose it. Same to management.
It was an open-ended discussion. The interviewer was good and very accommodating. They asked relevant questions and did not unnecessarily drag them out. Most of the questions were based on the experience I mentioned in the CV.
After the initial 30-minute phone call, which was very nice, the hiring manager didn't want to proceed. The company sounded great, and the conversation with HR was very pleasant.
There were 3 rounds: 1. 30-minute call with the recruiter. 2. 60-minute call with the Hiring Manager. This was a very nice talk, mostly about my experience and the project. There were a couple of general questions, like what quality code means to
It was an open-ended discussion. The interviewer was good and very accommodating. They asked relevant questions and did not unnecessarily drag them out. Most of the questions were based on the experience I mentioned in the CV.
After the initial 30-minute phone call, which was very nice, the hiring manager didn't want to proceed. The company sounded great, and the conversation with HR was very pleasant.
There were 3 rounds: 1. 30-minute call with the recruiter. 2. 60-minute call with the Hiring Manager. This was a very nice talk, mostly about my experience and the project. There were a couple of general questions, like what quality code means to