It’s based on three interviews. Excluding the first one with HR, in the others, there are always two interviewers, which is a very important detail to reduce bias.

It's clear that the interviewers have extensive interview experience (beyond their vast technical expertise). They don't just assess your knowledge of a specific library; I understand they're evaluating broader criteria.

In my experience, it's one of the best processes I've ever undertaken, regardless of the outcome.

It's clear that the company's values are reflected in the interviews.

They give you an exercise, and you do a live code review of it.

They also dig into your work experience and ask follow-up questions about it.