Good food, interesting campus, smart coworkers.
Insufficient training: Epic did not train me on how to do most of the workflows I needed to do for testing.
Not always a problem, but oftentimes I found it difficult to self-study new workflows on top of keeping up with company mandated training and other testing and administrative duties. If you're a good self-starter and more motivated for the work than I was, this might not be a huge problem. But it feels weird to throw a bunch of college graduates into a completely new environment without actually training them on a core part of their job, or at least having programs and coherent online resources to teach them how to do the work.
Communication and prioritization often are lacking.
Unsympathetic team leads: A lot of the team leads are young (late 20s - early 30s) and seem to only know Epic. Moreover, they don't seem to understand how mental health issues can affect one's work in a meaningful capacity, instead giving boiler plate advice like "manage your time wisely" and "talk to someone if you need help (talk to whom?)"
Ultimately, feels like the job is meant to weed out those who don't fit in, while finding those who do and rewarding them with more power (which they never explicitly state, instead using wishy-washy language like team lead) and more work, rather than using the skills that people bring in to make better products. And judging by Epic's results, I can't say it's a bad strategy. But it does lead to a lot of echo chamber type management, and leads to team leads being primarily unsympathetic type-A people.
You apply for PM or TS, and they may let you know you are also considered for the QM role. The interview includes a presentation that you have to make. I think it is effectively the same as PM, but you are judged for PM (IS) or QM.
You will likely do several examinations prior to the actual interview (i.e., basic math/rates/coding tests, plus a personality assessment that might help them place you). The actual interview is about average-to-difficult (be prepared to answer STAR
Very simple interview process for entry-level positions. Logic-based, they want to see your ability to solve problems, as well as your ability to effectively communicate with others and how well you can collaborate.
You apply for PM or TS, and they may let you know you are also considered for the QM role. The interview includes a presentation that you have to make. I think it is effectively the same as PM, but you are judged for PM (IS) or QM.
You will likely do several examinations prior to the actual interview (i.e., basic math/rates/coding tests, plus a personality assessment that might help them place you). The actual interview is about average-to-difficult (be prepared to answer STAR
Very simple interview process for entry-level positions. Logic-based, they want to see your ability to solve problems, as well as your ability to effectively communicate with others and how well you can collaborate.