Good work environment. Good benefits. Some projects have good technology and scope to learn. Investment banking domain in some projects, so learning will keep you occupied (if you like it, though). Not too much work pressure most of the year; sometimes you will need to stretch, but that is the norm in every IT project, so no complaints. Great place for developers as they get higher salaries and other monetary benefits.
QA management is spineless and they think it is an overhead for the project. They don't care for QA folks.
Decision making is US-centric, so your voice will not be heard much.
High level of politics (norm in every company, I suppose).
Commitment to India operations is questionable (won't be surprised if it closes in 5 years).
Growth will be painfully slow at the bottom level but faster at SPM and above levels.
Good work in many regards, but please don't make promises you cannot hold to new or existing employees. Treat QA as an internal part of IT, not like third-class citizens.
Totally 3 rounds. * Written test: Consisted of 35 questions, 20 quant and 15 verbal. Total time given was 50 minutes. * Technical Interview: Basic questions on programming and analytical problems. * Behavioral Analysis. * HR.
The interview panel was not good. They were asking questions without knowing the correct answers and were telling my answers were wrong even when they were correct. It was a really bad experience. The interviewer had incorrect knowledge on primary k
Aptitude test followed by three rounds of one-on-one interviews: technical round, behavioral round, and managerial round. The technical round was mostly on DBMS and OOPs. The behavioral round involved answering how I would react to certain situatio
Totally 3 rounds. * Written test: Consisted of 35 questions, 20 quant and 15 verbal. Total time given was 50 minutes. * Technical Interview: Basic questions on programming and analytical problems. * Behavioral Analysis. * HR.
The interview panel was not good. They were asking questions without knowing the correct answers and were telling my answers were wrong even when they were correct. It was a really bad experience. The interviewer had incorrect knowledge on primary k
Aptitude test followed by three rounds of one-on-one interviews: technical round, behavioral round, and managerial round. The technical round was mostly on DBMS and OOPs. The behavioral round involved answering how I would react to certain situatio