'LEAP' - Their technologist graduate program is exceptional. Six months of training, four of which are classroom-based. Professional external trainers teach everything from agile to public speaking to Spring MVC. They invest heavily in their young talent, and it pays.
Salary was competitive as a grad (in my location at least), as are annual salary increases (I averaged 8-10% per year entering as a grad, in several smaller bumps, enough even to stay on par with peers who job-hopped!), though I don't know how that scales for higher-ups. The performance/review process is formalized and well-run.
The work environment is very good: flexible work hours, good work/life balance, very little tolerance for toxic behavior, and good people. I usually work 40 hours and leave the office at 5 most days.
As a technologist, the office is still very male-dominated, though this is a problem everywhere for software engineers.
A lot of the salary/bonus structure is very clearly tied up in the overall company performance. During a recession or market downturn, the salary/bonus experience may be very different.
There seems to be a lot of politicking in the upper management. My team felt this through frequent group re-orgs, initiative changes, sudden U-turns on key priorities, etc.
Keep investing in your employees, and keep the huge BU re-orgs and site-unification strategies to a minimum as senior leaders move around.
Had one round of interview with a panel of three: two developers and one from HR. Was asked some technical and behavioral questions. All technical questions were about random, very specific features in Java.
Both my interviewers were extremely friendly and made me feel like they wanted me to succeed. They were easy to talk to, and I felt confident in both interviews. They didn't really ask any technical questions other than what languages/technologies I
There were 4 rounds: Aptitude: 30 questions, which included English, quantitative aptitude, and technical aptitude (OS, DBMS, networking, algorithms, etc.). Then 2 coding questions of medium difficulty, both based on arrays. 2 technical interviews (
Had one round of interview with a panel of three: two developers and one from HR. Was asked some technical and behavioral questions. All technical questions were about random, very specific features in Java.
Both my interviewers were extremely friendly and made me feel like they wanted me to succeed. They were easy to talk to, and I felt confident in both interviews. They didn't really ask any technical questions other than what languages/technologies I
There were 4 rounds: Aptitude: 30 questions, which included English, quantitative aptitude, and technical aptitude (OS, DBMS, networking, algorithms, etc.). Then 2 coding questions of medium difficulty, both based on arrays. 2 technical interviews (