You're likely to work with kind people who just want to do their work as well as they can and then go home. You can have a very long and successful career (at the firm) if you choose to stay and play the game or opt-out entirely.
The culture of promotions and performance is based largely on tenure (at the firm) and visibility rather than actual contributions. Titles are given as "in-the-door" incentives to new hires and withheld from internal candidates (unless making internal moves for promotions). It's well known and frequently communicated that you need to move groups to get promotions, yet you're encouraged to communicate your intentions to your manager.
Every internal policy seems geared towards retaining mediocre talent (that can't leave) and encouraging talent to seek better options within or outside the firm. Pay is based on "cost of labor," which trails by one or more years. You'll constantly be paid at your "I would riot below this" number year-after-year.
Stop stack-ranking for performance ratings. Start recognizing talent with base pay and direct incentives. Stop hiring externally with absurd titles that demean the already-employed and underpaid who make the bulk of the contributions year after year.
In campus hiring, I cleared the technical interview but failed to clear the HR round. Simple questions were asked from various different topics on the resume and generally from core subjects.
The overall experience was good. DBMS-based questions were okay, but DSA, they asked so tough, we didn't know anything like TimSort. After that, they asked questions based on what answer you tell them.
Technical round and behaviour round. 1 hour technical and 1 hour behaviour. Only after you clear the technical round then you get to go to the behaviour round. The process is quite straightforward as compared to other companies.
In campus hiring, I cleared the technical interview but failed to clear the HR round. Simple questions were asked from various different topics on the resume and generally from core subjects.
The overall experience was good. DBMS-based questions were okay, but DSA, they asked so tough, we didn't know anything like TimSort. After that, they asked questions based on what answer you tell them.
Technical round and behaviour round. 1 hour technical and 1 hour behaviour. Only after you clear the technical round then you get to go to the behaviour round. The process is quite straightforward as compared to other companies.