Growing company with low work pressure.
Wrong technical decisions. CIO has no clue. BS level knowledge. VP doesn't dare to stand up against unfair treatment of employees.
Fire the CIO
The interview consists of 4 parts: * Coding 1 * Coding 2 * Architectural * Behavioural Every part is objective and focused on the most important skills and knowledge. I think that this approach is right because it is not focused on unimportant know
Very bad, pathetic. The interviewer had the least interest in conducting the interview, and the HR had no proper communication. There wasn't even a place to sit down. It reflected that the HR was doing a favor.
There are a total of 3 rounds: 2 coding and 1 LLD round. In the first round, the interviewer acted like a supervisor and had absolutely no input. I misunderstood the question and wrote the whole code. At the end, they kept directing me in the wrong
The interview consists of 4 parts: * Coding 1 * Coding 2 * Architectural * Behavioural Every part is objective and focused on the most important skills and knowledge. I think that this approach is right because it is not focused on unimportant know
Very bad, pathetic. The interviewer had the least interest in conducting the interview, and the HR had no proper communication. There wasn't even a place to sit down. It reflected that the HR was doing a favor.
There are a total of 3 rounds: 2 coding and 1 LLD round. In the first round, the interviewer acted like a supervisor and had absolutely no input. I misunderstood the question and wrote the whole code. At the end, they kept directing me in the wrong