The company's strengths lie in its strong team dynamics and positive culture, fostering collaboration and employee satisfaction. Additionally, its adherence to industry-standard pay ensures fair compensation, attracting and retaining top talent.
The company faces several issues that need addressing. Firstly, there are no extra benefits for employees, which can lead to dissatisfaction. Secondly, existing employees earn less than newcomers, causing demotivation. The leadership lacks vision and fails to create opportunities for growth, with many employees knowing more about the market than leaders. Growth is challenging due to a lack of stimulating work, with most teams stuck in maintenance mode. Many talented people are leaving, emphasizing the need for urgent reforms to retain top talent and improve company performance..
To enhance the company's performance and employee satisfaction, it's crucial to avoid unnecessary cost-cutting measures on minor expenses. Instead, focus on investing in skill development and market research to identify new opportunities for growth. By creating new areas of work and making roles more lucrative, employees will feel motivated and engaged, leading to improved overall productivity and success for the company.
The interview process was well-defined and fast. I applied too late, so other candidates got a chance. I would try again if a new opportunity pops up. First, it was an HR interview, then the hiring manager.
There was a screening round with a TA partner. The discussion related to the job, and the interviewer asked basic questions about qualifications, work status, and experience. After that, there was another interview with the hiring manager. It was a
I applied online, and a recruiter scheduled a screening session. After that, a tech interview was scheduled. I failed the tech interview. It felt like I was writing a college exam, not appearing for an interview. The recruiter wasn't professional.
The interview process was well-defined and fast. I applied too late, so other candidates got a chance. I would try again if a new opportunity pops up. First, it was an HR interview, then the hiring manager.
There was a screening round with a TA partner. The discussion related to the job, and the interviewer asked basic questions about qualifications, work status, and experience. After that, there was another interview with the hiring manager. It was a
I applied online, and a recruiter scheduled a screening session. After that, a tech interview was scheduled. I failed the tech interview. It felt like I was writing a college exam, not appearing for an interview. The recruiter wasn't professional.