Relatively speaking, the work-life balance.
General Motors, once a symbol of American industrial strength, has unfortunately devolved into a toxic work environment where genuine talent and hard work go unrecognized.
The company operates on a rigid and inhumane system where personal connections outweigh skills and expertise. Instead of fostering a culture of innovation and growth, the workplace is riddled with favoritism, mismanagement, and a lack of accountability at all levels.
HR, which should serve as an advocate for employees and the organization, is unprofessional, self-serving, and indifferent. Rather than supporting employees, they function more as corporate enforcers, ensuring their own security while disregarding legitimate concerns. Employees quickly learn that they cannot trust HR to act in their best interests.
The management structure is deeply flawed, characterized by incompetence and inefficiency. Directors and executives are often hired based on connections rather than merit, resulting in erratic decision-making and widespread uncertainty. Employees are left without direction, while leadership appears disorganized and disconnected from day-to-day realities.
Layoffs are handled arbitrarily, with no regard for performance or contributions. There is no job security, no clear path for career growth, and no incentive to excel. Promotions are rare, and efforts to drive meaningful change within the company are met with indifference.
Despite a set of corporate values, leadership is the first to disregard them, creating an environment where dishonesty and self-interest thrive.
Ultimately, General Motors does not cultivate a culture of excellence, loyalty, or fairness. Employees are not valued, and the company itself operates as a system of exploitation rather than collaboration. If you are seeking a workplace where your skills and integrity are respected, this is not the place for you. Consider GM only as a last resort—otherwise, look elsewhere for an employer that truly values its workforce.
The interview process began with a phone screening conducted by a recruiter, where general questions were asked. Eric informed me that the process would involve six rounds, including multiple LeetCode-style interviews repeated across three rounds. T
Was reached out to regarding taking a Codility test that consisted of 3 questions. I had 5 hours to take the test, and any language was allowed on the web application.
First was an HR screening, and then a technical screening/interview. If I pass this one, then there will be more rounds, maybe around 3-4 look interviews, but I'm not sure.
The interview process began with a phone screening conducted by a recruiter, where general questions were asked. Eric informed me that the process would involve six rounds, including multiple LeetCode-style interviews repeated across three rounds. T
Was reached out to regarding taking a Codility test that consisted of 3 questions. I had 5 hours to take the test, and any language was allowed on the web application.
First was an HR screening, and then a technical screening/interview. If I pass this one, then there will be more rounds, maybe around 3-4 look interviews, but I'm not sure.