The company is constantly evolving and has left most of its worst behaviors in the past. Good hiring and firing decisions have led to great leaders and teams doing good work.
Reputation in technical and non-technical spaces is still iffy based on the past. We have lost good leaders to other companies with more brand recognition and better pay.
Identifying and promoting good leaders from within has been an accelerant in recent years.
Don't try to follow everyone else in SV.
It was a straightforward interview. I was asked general questions, math-related or data structures. "Cracking the Coding Interview" would suffice. I was interviewed by a person who worked at Microsoft previously for 11 years, and he said that the int
The interview process was 4 hours long and involved four members of the team. It included specific technical questions, some FizzBuzz, and some higher-order problems. They assessed both technical and professional skills, clearly indicating they are
The online technical interview involved several stages. Initially, there was a technical question, followed by a runtime question. This was then followed by a behavioral interview, which was quite standard. Common questions included discussing a fa
It was a straightforward interview. I was asked general questions, math-related or data structures. "Cracking the Coding Interview" would suffice. I was interviewed by a person who worked at Microsoft previously for 11 years, and he said that the int
The interview process was 4 hours long and involved four members of the team. It included specific technical questions, some FizzBuzz, and some higher-order problems. They assessed both technical and professional skills, clearly indicating they are
The online technical interview involved several stages. Initially, there was a technical question, followed by a runtime question. This was then followed by a behavioral interview, which was quite standard. Common questions included discussing a fa