It's a stable and mature public company. You get to work from home, and there aren't too many meetings.
Pervasive cost-cutting, especially since the start of 2024, has not only made it hard to be efficient but also stifles career advancement. The only way to progress in your career is to leave.
Long-time employees will probably stay because they have big stock grants waiting to vest, but for anybody else, the pay is junk.
The cost-cutting has gone way beyond what is reasonable. Tools keep disappearing, even if they weren't that expensive to begin with.
They want to get rid of Slack to save money. Slack. Maybe they won't, but it keeps getting floated as a credible idea, so I wouldn't put it past them.
Security is the #1 priority, but there is no foresight or long-term plan, so the security edicts come in as a "Request of the Week" to be completed yesterday (usually we have 1-2 weeks).
It kills morale because, aside from providing no value to customers, we have to drop everything to get it done in time.
It almost looks like they are trying to make the working environment unpleasant on purpose to create attrition so they can avoid the bad publicity of mass layoffs. Plus, that way, the people who are left will be so demotivated that they won't expect raises.
Give people meaningful careers and reward excellence, because happy employees do better work.
If you want to trim payroll, be direct and lay people off, instead of irritating them until they resign. The share price should be okay; Wall Street is fine with layoffs. Doing irreversible damage to the team's morale is not a viable long-term strategy.
I had two interviews, one technical and one behavioral, each an hour long. The experience was smooth and positive; interviewers were friendly, helpful, and professional. The overall process was efficient and quick.
The interview process was in person at their Kirkland office. It consisted of three 5-minute rounds where we chose team leads to conduct one-on-one interviews.
I initially had some phone screenings. I was then placed on an initial coding interview, which seemed to go well. The questions focused on my experience and my past, and how it related to the role. The interviewer let me speak. The first call was g
I had two interviews, one technical and one behavioral, each an hour long. The experience was smooth and positive; interviewers were friendly, helpful, and professional. The overall process was efficient and quick.
The interview process was in person at their Kirkland office. It consisted of three 5-minute rounds where we chose team leads to conduct one-on-one interviews.
I initially had some phone screenings. I was then placed on an initial coding interview, which seemed to go well. The questions focused on my experience and my past, and how it related to the role. The interviewer let me speak. The first call was g