I had applied online and had the initial recruiter call.

She gave me the option of choosing between general SWE or ML SWE. I moved forward with the ML SWE role.

She scheduled a phone interview. It was an open-ended, probability-based coding question.

I then went onsite. The onsite comprised of 5 interviews:

• 2 ML
• 2 Python coding
• 1 general software engineering round

...and lunch.

After that, since team matching was taking some time, the recruiter forwarded my package to the hiring committee.

I was rejected, with the feedback stating that while the ML feedback was good, the algorithms and coding feedback was not up to the bar of general software engineering.

The entire process was smooth, and the recruiter kept me updated the whole time.

Coding rounds were similar to general software engineering questions based on trees. ML was like ML design rounds.