It's a large company now and has lost its ability to move fast (product dependent).
Increased bureaucracy: Getting anything of consequence implemented requires 10+ types of reviews (code, design, a11y, privacy, SRE, logging, legal, QA, support, i18n, capacity, security, leadership), many of which have overburdened and slow reviewers.
Senior staff and managers spend ~40% of the year doing performance review tasks in the background (self-assessments, peer feedback, calibration, promo committees).
Mostly use internal proprietary tech, which comes with an increased maintenance burden through technical mandates and deprecations.
Stop being a tech island
Screening round. I was asked a DP question on the partition problem. I started with a brute force approach, gave a bit better solution, but was not able to provide the DP one.
The level is OK, not too hard but not too easy. Actually, I was expecting much more challenging questions. The only problem is that they give you only a partial description, so you need to communicate with the interviewer to get more info. I did it
The interview process was great. I enjoyed the learning experience. The coding task wasn't too difficult; it was simple. However, there were multiple tasks to complete. It was challenging but worthwhile.
Screening round. I was asked a DP question on the partition problem. I started with a brute force approach, gave a bit better solution, but was not able to provide the DP one.
The level is OK, not too hard but not too easy. Actually, I was expecting much more challenging questions. The only problem is that they give you only a partial description, so you need to communicate with the interviewer to get more info. I did it
The interview process was great. I enjoyed the learning experience. The coding task wasn't too difficult; it was simple. However, there were multiple tasks to complete. It was challenging but worthwhile.