The company and most of the people here truly care about things, and Google takes every chance it gets to have a positive impact on the world.
Facilities teams make decisions that people don't like without clear explanation at best, and at worst, many contradictory explanations that turn out to be after-the-fact justifications.
If you want people to be more productive, give them less to worry about. Currently, it feels like we have to keep voicing our dissatisfaction in order to maintain all the nice stuff we have.
It's great that we're allowed to voice our concerns and management listens to us; it would be better if we didn't feel like we needed to.
First, an online assessment, then the HR call, then several rounds of technical interview (you need to solve data structure/algorithm problems), and finally a manager interview (mostly behavioral questions).
LeetCode basically doesn't care about experience or brains. LeetCode is kinda weird, though. But what can you expect from FAANG besides that? Just save your time and energy and apply to a real software company.
The first round was behavioral, focusing on STAR method-type questions. They mostly asked about being a team player and having a positive attitude. This was followed by three LeetCode rounds. Two medium and one medium-hard question were asked durin
First, an online assessment, then the HR call, then several rounds of technical interview (you need to solve data structure/algorithm problems), and finally a manager interview (mostly behavioral questions).
LeetCode basically doesn't care about experience or brains. LeetCode is kinda weird, though. But what can you expect from FAANG besides that? Just save your time and energy and apply to a real software company.
The first round was behavioral, focusing on STAR method-type questions. They mostly asked about being a team player and having a positive attitude. This was followed by three LeetCode rounds. Two medium and one medium-hard question were asked durin