I applied for the Software Engineering Intern, Android (Summer 2022) position on their career site.
First, I completed an online assessment. After receiving their email confirming my completion, I proceeded to the next round. The second round involved a take-home assignment where I was asked to develop a mobile app based on specific requirements. They provided a week to complete this assignment.
I spent over 20 hours on the assignment, aiming to earn as many bonus points as possible. I encountered several misalignments between the provided online API and the task requirements, prompting me to email them for clarification. However, they were unresponsive to these concerns, stating I should use my own judgment. Again, their communication regarding my questions was minimal. They only confirmed receipt of my assignment a full week after I had submitted it.
Another week passed before I received a system email informing me that I would not be chosen for the job. I felt misled by the experience. Given the complete lack of feedback on the assignment, I doubt they thoroughly reviewed my code, and I now feel I wasted over 20 hours on their poorly designed task. I'm curious if this was an isolated experience or common among other candidates. If it was a consistent experience for everyone, I strongly recommend against applying for at least this position at Grammarly.
Online assessment includes a coding challenge, mostly LeetCode easy to medium difficulty problems.
Take-home assignment: developing a mobile app using data retrieved from a given online API.
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Grammarly Software Engineering, Android role in San Francisco, California.
Grammarly's interview process for their Software Engineering, Android roles in San Francisco, California is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Grammarly's Software Engineering, Android interview process in San Francisco, California.