I applied through a recruiter. The process took 2 weeks.
I had a first round interview with the Head of Eng which was more of a technical deep dive. From there I was asked to complete a take home assignment which was a set of code related to the LLM tech the company works on and was asked to make the code work properly and put my own creative spin on it. I was told this was instead of the Leetcode style interview that most co's do onsite. I found this to be the coolest take home assignment I've done before. It was challenging but gave me an opportunity to dive into things like RAG which I hadn't worked with before.
From there I came onsite and had a challenging team session where we worked through a technical problem that was specific to things they were currently working on. This was challenging and really made me think on my feet but I found it a good way to get to interact with the team in a more real world setting which was a pretty novel way to interview compared to what I normally see at big tech and startups these days.
After that I had a number of 1:1's with the team and multiple co-founders. I was surprised how technical the co-founders were. Lastly I met with the CEO who gave me an overview of the vision for the company which was great.
Talk me through the pros and cons of a technology you consider yourself an expert in.
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Hippocratic AI Principal Software Engineer role in Palo Alto, California.
Hippocratic AI's interview process for their Principal Software Engineer roles in Palo Alto, California is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very good feelings for Hippocratic AI's Principal Software Engineer interview process in Palo Alto, California.