Pros: Good company to work for. Best place to learn more.

Cons: Getting delayed to get into the project.

Pros: Ah, where do I begin? This company really knows how to make you feel like you're on vacation while still getting paid. The environment is incredibly laid-back — think "come in whenever you want, leave whenever you feel like it." You could basically show up in pajamas if that’s your thing. There’s absolutely no pressure, which is nice, unless you consider the pressure of deciding whether you want to take an extra long coffee break or leave early because, hey, there’s no one watching! The work? It’s light. Super light. If you’re into cloud development and want to write just enough code to say you did something, this is your dream job.

Cons: The catch? Well, if you’re unlucky enough to have a manager who actually cares, then maybe you’ll experience the horror of “projects” and “deadlines.” But, if you happen to get blessed with a manager who’s as chill as the office, you’re golden. The only real downside is that you might find yourself wondering if you’ve actually accomplished anything at the end of the day, because... well, you probably haven’t. But hey, who’s counting?

Pros: There is nothing to say.

Cons: I took part in IBM's on-campus recruitment for a Software Developer role and solved both coding questions within 15 minutes. Despite completing the round quickly and correctly, I was not selected, while others who took 40 minutes or more were shortlisted. It feels completely unfair, and IBM should not conduct their process this way. If speed and accuracy in solving the problems don't matter, then what's the point of the coding round? There was no transparency or explanation for why people who performed slower were chosen over those who completed the tasks faster. IBM really needs to make their selection criteria clear to avoid this kind of unfair treatment. It’s frustrating for candidates who perform well but get overlooked without any explanation.