Pros: Good company to work for.

Cons: None that I can think of.

Pros: The company provides a supportive work environment, offers good learning opportunities, and has a collaborative team. The benefits are competitive, and the leadership team is generally approachable and supportive. Additionally, there’s room to grow and develop new skills.

Cons: Some processes could be more streamlined to improve efficiency. Communication between teams can be inconsistent, which sometimes causes delays. Additionally, there’s a need for more clear long-term growth opportunities for employees.

Pros: Work from home was allowed at any time, no questions asked. There was no hour tracking or anyone making sure I was meeting quotas, as long as I was getting my work done.

Cons: The team moved slowly and individually. There was no sense of teamwork or camaraderie, only individuals with tasks. This was exacerbated by the fact that upper management was forcing the departments into Agile, which led to employees used to doing Waterfall to simply do Waterfall with iterations. Agile was used entirely as an hour-tracking tool for the bosses to send angry emails every day based on their pointless charts, which were based on numbers that everyone was making up. As a 20-something, being the only one in a sea of long-time employees with the next youngest employee being in their 30s is a bit of a shock. The fact that IBM only hires college hires or internal employees makes the young ones want to leave, and the internal employees to result in an echo chamber where no one advances the team. To have to use a version control system whose last major update was in 1995 is insane and will scare off any new talent to a more modern company (where modern in this case could be someone using CVS...).