For over 10 years, IBM was a great place to work. My blood was blue, and I lived and breathed IBM.
Great people, awful managers (although there were a few exceptions, typically those who made it to upper management from rank-and-file positions).
Despite profits in the 10s of billions, IBM can now only afford "statutory minimum" packages, despite offering significantly better separation packages less than a year ago.
Ginni... 17 consecutive quarters of declining revenue on the trot. How much longer do we continue this trend? Either the trend must stop, or the leaders must go!
Reconsider separation packages. Management preach that IBMers should "do the right thing," and then dish out statutory minimum redundancy payments in a complete, apparent disregard to their own advice.
The interview process consists of two rounds: 1. A technical round to assess your skill set. 2. An HR managerial round to discuss past work experiences and salary packages.
On-call discussion, followed by a video call interview with a conference, a face-to-face HR round, then a face-to-face interview with the technical team, and finally an HR round regarding salary and other aspects.
There were two rounds. The first round was the technical interview, where they asked technical questions on the technologies I worked on, such as Spring Boot and microservices. The second round was the HR round.
The interview process consists of two rounds: 1. A technical round to assess your skill set. 2. An HR managerial round to discuss past work experiences and salary packages.
On-call discussion, followed by a video call interview with a conference, a face-to-face HR round, then a face-to-face interview with the technical team, and finally an HR round regarding salary and other aspects.
There were two rounds. The first round was the technical interview, where they asked technical questions on the technologies I worked on, such as Spring Boot and microservices. The second round was the HR round.