A lot of training videos, a lot of good ideas, quite stable. Less layoff news compared to a major competitor. Good 401K match.
Lack of engineering focus; there are more queens than working bees. Heavy-weighted processes, poor strategy execution, lot of bureaucracy, low social capital making it hard to retain young, energetic employees.
My interview at IBM was smooth and professional. The panel focused on technical skills, problem-solving, and communication. They were friendly, asked scenario-based questions, and emphasized teamwork and adaptability. Overall, it was good.
All my interviewers were super cool, and from the questions asked, I was quite happy that I was going to the right team. However, there was an equally bad experience on the hiring/recruiting front. Communication was poor, infrequent, or nonexistent
The interview was very good and in-depth, covering trending technology. The technical person had a good command of Java and Spring. There were two rounds of interviews, and the process was smooth.
My interview at IBM was smooth and professional. The panel focused on technical skills, problem-solving, and communication. They were friendly, asked scenario-based questions, and emphasized teamwork and adaptability. Overall, it was good.
All my interviewers were super cool, and from the questions asked, I was quite happy that I was going to the right team. However, there was an equally bad experience on the hiring/recruiting front. Communication was poor, infrequent, or nonexistent
The interview was very good and in-depth, covering trending technology. The technical person had a good command of Java and Spring. There were two rounds of interviews, and the process was smooth.