This was for a phone screening interview for a GPU competitive analysis team.
The interview was going smoothly and well overall. The hiring manager seemed decent and professional. We covered introductions about the team and their requirements, as well as a discussion of my background and how I might fit within the team. Everything was proceeding well.
Finally, the hiring manager asked a question that he was not supposed to ask according to Intel's guidelines. He inquired about my previous grade level at Intel before I left years ago. The moment I provided the answer, I could feel the tone change. I knew it was over at that point. I had been successfully performing work at a much higher grade level than my actual grade level at Intel.
According to Intel's internal guidelines, he should not have asked this question. He should judge candidates based on their experience and qualifications, not on previous Intel grade levels from years ago, especially if they left on good terms. This is why Intel does not provide hiring managers with such information.
Unfortunately, I have lost many great opportunities at Intel because managers have asked similar questions, ignoring my significant experience both at Intel and afterwards.
I had the interview on Friday after 2:00 PM and received the rejection email on Monday at 8:30 AM. Clearly, the grade level question was the reason for the rejection.
What was your grade level at Intel when you left years ago?
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Intel Ai GPU Architect role in Santa Clara, California.
Intel's interview process for their Ai GPU Architect roles in Santa Clara, California is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Intel's Ai GPU Architect interview process in Santa Clara, California.