No cons noticed so far.
2-3 phase interview 1. Discussion about candidate experience, challenges, roles, etc. Also, a few technical theoretical questions about algorithms, data structures, and CPU architecture. 2. Technical interview with 1-2 problems. One of the problems
Boring questions, generic ones, sorting a list, a 3-color array... the usual stuff. The interviewers seemed sleepy, and I don't think they were interested in the interview. It was a waste of time. I would not want to work there.
I came to the site and met with two engineers from the desired team. After a short introduction, they presented the role in more detail (but not too much detail). We then started the technical interview questions.
2-3 phase interview 1. Discussion about candidate experience, challenges, roles, etc. Also, a few technical theoretical questions about algorithms, data structures, and CPU architecture. 2. Technical interview with 1-2 problems. One of the problems
Boring questions, generic ones, sorting a list, a 3-color array... the usual stuff. The interviewers seemed sleepy, and I don't think they were interested in the interview. It was a waste of time. I would not want to work there.
I came to the site and met with two engineers from the desired team. After a short introduction, they presented the role in more detail (but not too much detail). We then started the technical interview questions.