Good people, relevant technologies, making a change in the way software is being delivered.
Not much really,
They do listen to employees and improve constantly.
3 interviews and a take home exam. First with HR, then an exam, another talk with the director of Production engineering then an onsite to continue it and get the offer. Wonderfully warm and ambitious group of professionals.
Classic interview - Linked lists, algorithms, exercise (on-site, 3 hours) on a laptop. Interviewers were very friendly and modest. There was no stressful atmosphere, and overall I completed around 80% of the coding exercise. Moved on the next step.
1. Short interview over phone. 2. Long (too long) interview with HR at the office. 3. Tech interview with CTO by Zoom. The tech interview was a total disaster and extremely unprofessional. I felt CTO did not know what are the requirements for the
3 interviews and a take home exam. First with HR, then an exam, another talk with the director of Production engineering then an onsite to continue it and get the offer. Wonderfully warm and ambitious group of professionals.
Classic interview - Linked lists, algorithms, exercise (on-site, 3 hours) on a laptop. Interviewers were very friendly and modest. There was no stressful atmosphere, and overall I completed around 80% of the coding exercise. Moved on the next step.
1. Short interview over phone. 2. Long (too long) interview with HR at the office. 3. Tech interview with CTO by Zoom. The tech interview was a total disaster and extremely unprofessional. I felt CTO did not know what are the requirements for the