Jump isn't as agile as they think they are. There is tons of tech debt. A general fear of changes taking out production trading means that getting stuff fixed or improved is often slower than it should be. Coredev is somewhat dysfunctional.
It's not exactly a meritocracy. Front office trading teams take the lion's share of profits, though back office is working its butt off to make sure everything can run smoothly.
There's not much of a bigger picture. There appears to be no greater purpose to the work than profiting off the markets. Jump entices hundreds of incredibly smart people, who might otherwise be solving important issues in the real world, to just polish the P&L. For scientists and engineers, it's kind of an empty goal.
Have you considered philanthropy? It might give employees some job satisfaction, knowing their work is making the world a better place, while they can still remain focused on the bottom line.
Very unorganized. No schedule was given. No end time was provided. It was like, 'OK, let's see who else is available to interview you.' It was a very long day with no clear process. Overall, compared to other companies I interviewed with, it was not
Online coding challenge followed by a tech interview and three onsites. The last onsite includes a visit with the partner (oh what a pleasure) and the CIO. The recruiter took a long time to get back with an offer and was incredibly rude when I reje
Coding challenge, then phone screen, and finally a full day on-site technical interview. The recruiter is very attentive and responds quickly to emails. On-site interviews are with engineers, and they are very helpful and friendly during the process,
Very unorganized. No schedule was given. No end time was provided. It was like, 'OK, let's see who else is available to interview you.' It was a very long day with no clear process. Overall, compared to other companies I interviewed with, it was not
Online coding challenge followed by a tech interview and three onsites. The last onsite includes a visit with the partner (oh what a pleasure) and the CIO. The recruiter took a long time to get back with an offer and was incredibly rude when I reje
Coding challenge, then phone screen, and finally a full day on-site technical interview. The recruiter is very attentive and responds quickly to emails. On-site interviews are with engineers, and they are very helpful and friendly during the process,